Art Responses 2

As I mentioned previously in ‘Art Responses‘, the more I look at art the more I think that there is nothing much new to say or do. I believe that the universe is limited visually, and artists keep repeating things over and over again. Compositions, structures, placements, etc. Somehow, we are constrained by the limitations of physics. Here, I present a new set of works for comparison. Some of them are more coincidental then others. However, some works are more than just coincidences. They are actual responses to what appeared in art earlier. This is not a new discussion and my blog entry is a simple exercise on the matter.

11. Wrapped objects

12. Squares with Concentric Circles

13. Architectural Models

14. Cut Canvas

15. Missing Bodies

16. Stretched Footballs

17. Iconic Gold

18. Shit Art

19. Careless Swing

20. Sculptural Titillation

Man RayChristo | Wassily KandinskyChuck CloseKazimir Malevich | Renata de Andrade | Lucio FontanaAdriana Varejão | Anthony Gormley | Samantha HolmesGabriel Orozco | Felipe Barbosa | San Vitale [Theodora] | Gustav KlimtPiero Manzoni | Marcelo de Melo | FragonardYinka ShonibareAlexandros of AntiochSalvador Dalí

Art Responses

4 thoughts on “Art Responses 2

  1. : )
    I disagree with you!
    Well, we look a lot the art history for inspiration. But, I truly think things are changing, and, everytime art is saying about the present moment.


    1. I accept your disagreement 🙂
      Yes, it is mostly about the present moment. However, most artists are still repeating old formulae and adding things here and there. We are piling the new onto the old. A good archaeologist knows it well 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s